In the realm of legal practice, achieving justice and rendering its proceedings more accessible continue to stir compelling discourse. This becomes all the more intriguing as we explore the unwavering bond between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and law, a connection I am privileged to deeply engage with in my work. Today, my reflections veer towards a recent milestone in the European Court of Justice which affirms this bond with unwavering conviction.
Implementing AI within the legal landscape is more than a mere upgrade of internal procedures or enhancement of lawyer productivity. The paramount significance of this intermingling emerges through its ability to render the law more accessible. Navigating through the labyrinthine structures of the law can be overwhelmingly intricate and perhaps intimidating for a layperson. This is where AI shines its luminary potential, dismantling these intricacies, and ensuring the deliverance of law to its intended beneficiaries – the common folk.
Today’s anecdote from the ECJ admonishes us about a consumer rights case I had the honor of leading, a significant indicator of the immense power of merging legal understanding with technological advancements in our legal procedures. This singular case evidences how AI, when given its due harnessing, can be a beacon of change, bestowing every individual with accessible legal channels, and thereby, amplifying potential outcomes.
Take for instance, AI-powered document review instruments that can efficiently delve into extensive legal repositories, make sense of convoluted legal texts and historical case files, and present information in an easily understandable format. This dynamics, when integrated into user-friendly applications, can potentially mitigate the disparities in the legal terrain. Such easy access not only stimulates active involvement but also fosters understanding, effectively narrowing the distance between the law and the general public.
The contribution of AI towards a more democratic approach to law is in resonance with the ideals of my cherished luminaries: Fritz Bauer’s indomitable fight for justice, and Rolf Bender’s noble vision of “access to law”. It exemplifies the ground-breaking capacity of technology in transforming societal constructs and how justice is pursued.
In essence, nurturing the partnership between AI and law is a priority. Not only because it is a formidable instrument of change, but also because, as we witnessed in today’s precedent-setting case, it envisages a new method of materializing justice – not restricted to courtrooms, but extending into the lives and social fabrics of both individuals and communities. Indeed, the interplay of AI and law has the potential to effectuate what law was always intended to achieve: to cater to the average citizen. The path forward is full of promise, particularly as the achievements of today continue to shed light on our journey.
EN 
DE 
FR 
ET